The Charlie Kirk assassination has caused a positive cultural shift in the past week, and to be honest, it is both melancholy but also hopeful. It is melancholy in that an innocent life - Charlie Kirk's - was lost while still in his prime. It is also hopeful as the tragedy has mobilized people to say "enough is enough" to the demonic scourge of political leftism which has dominated our society for way too long. Charlie may have accomplished more in his death than he even did in his life in that regard, because he was a warrior for common sense and truth and people (even his enemies) understood that. The moral outrage surrounding his assassination is something of interest, because even people who fundamentally disagreed with him ideologically are condemning the murder as an evil act, which it is. But, there are still those who think they accomplished something big by seeing a man struck down in cold blood in the prime of his life, and those people are a special type of stupid, not to mention evil. It is curious how often evil and stupidity go hand-in-hand with each other, and the political Left personifies it. Fortunately, many of these radical Leftists are facing serious consequences for what they are doing, as they are starting to lose their jobs over violent speech and celebrating death. This is a good thing, but ironic also and here is why.
Only a few months ago, many of these same Leftists who are losing their jobs for celebrating murder and violence were the very same people who tried to get people fired over stupid pronouns. These lunatics treated addressing a man as a "he" as if it were a capital crime, and they called for blood. Oddly, now that the tables have turned on them, they are the ones whining about not having "freedom of speech," when they were also the very ones who tried to steal that from the rest of us. The irony is not lost, and it shows that our society is starting to get some common sense back. Using the wrong stupid made-up pronoun (no, "xe/xim" is not a thing, sorry!) is NOT morally equivalent to celebrating violence and murder, and yesterday when I was watching Michael Knowles talk about this on his show, a couple of very important things stood out, and I want to briefly touch on those now.
Knowles correctly noted that it should be a consequence of losing one's job if you work in certain industries and you are promoting violence. For instance, if you are a service worker in a restaurant, I don't think customers are going to be too confident to eat anything you serve them if you are celebrating murdering those who disagree with you. A person who has that warped mentality could easily poison or spit in someone's meal, and that is a dangerous risk. So, in that case, firing such a person is probably a wise thing to do. Also, in the medical profession - if a doctor or nurse is celebrating the violence against or murder of someone they disagree with, do you really want to entrust your medical care to that person, seriously?? A doctor with an attitude problem like that will inevitably kill someone, and again, that is a risk that is not worth taking. Then, there is education - if teachers, professors, or school administrators are touting violence, and are doing so with impressionable young minds, then they deserve to lose their jobs because they have the potential of inciting a mob mentality among young people. These three key professional spheres - hospitality, medical care, and education - are areas you do NOT want radicalization to be propagated, as it could cause some huge problems. There are other professions likewise - police, military, fire rescue, etc. - where such behavior should be discouraged and there should be zero tolerance for violent rhetoric. In all of those professional spheres, one serves the greater public, and targeting or discrimination based on ideological viewpoints is not only unprofessional, but can be downright dangerous. While key sectors such as those are integral, in all honesty bad rhetoric should be discouraged and penalized in any type of occupation, and thankfully employers are starting to understand this. Let me further elaborate.
At the Catholic high school where I teach, thankfully the subject of Charlie Kirk's assassination has not been a topic of discussion, and what I have heard comes from teachers who were actually not supportive of the assassination - both teachers stated that despite how we may disagree with someone, it is not worth killing them over. And, both teachers are correct (although one also went off on a rant against guns, saying they all need to be thrown into the sea - I definitely understand where that teacher is coming from, but the error is that the gun itself was not the problem, but rather the fact the gun was in the wrong hands). In my case, I agreed almost 100% with Charlie, and for me his death took away a great voice of reason from the public forum of civil discourse. However, I understand that there are others who don't agree with him, but what I respect is that these people also understand how tragic and wrong it was for his life to be taken. That is a sign of maturity on the part of these people, in particular my two teacher colleagues at the school where I teach. No one deserves to die for political beliefs or religious convictions, even if we think those beliefs are wrong - people have the right to think for themselves and have opinions about things, and no one deserves to die for that. However, if such rhetoric from others incites violence and celebrates it, other consequences are in order for those individuals because it then becomes serious. Again though, we don't want them eliminated, but perhaps they should not be in jobs where they impact and influence others, as their views can get in the way of the professional attitude of their duties. Freedom of speech, like any right, also comes with a responsibility - the First Amendment in no way covers incendiary speech that promotes violence and encourages murdering of others, and if someone engages in it, there are consequences for those actions. This works with the other amendments in the Bill of Rights too - the 2nd Amendment, for example, allows for the right to bear arms (meaning fundamentally to own a firearm), but responsible use of that firearm is also implied by the exercise of that right. No liberty is complete liberty - there are boundaries and responsibilities to be respected too.
Even as I personally grieve the loss of Charlie Kirk's life, at the same time I see some good fruit - the sheer coldness of the murder has shaken people up, and human decency is starting to take control over politically-correct BS again. Our society has been at this point treated to years of some of the weirdest and most radical garbage that humanity is capable of coming up with, and while it was allowed to fester for some time, it also started to show the decay and failure it produces, and people have finally decided that it was enough. I see this as a positive in our society, as it means we are starting to truly wake up to this garbage called "wokeness" and perhaps it means there is hope for our civilization. Granted, there is still a lot of damage to repair, but it seems as if there has been a positive re-direct for now and I can accept that. It remains to be seen what the total impact will be on our nation, and on Western Civilization as a whole, but I am becoming more optimistic. It also means that Charlie Kirk did not die in vain - the overwhelming shock and empathy that a large number of people have for this tragedy means that some seed has been sown, and perhaps what Charlie was robbed of doing in life will be compensated by the greater impact his legacy will have. May God continue to help us with all this, and we need now more than ever to trust in God's guidance to help really heal our land.
There is so much more that could be said about this, but I think the gist of the sentiment - which I share with millions of people right now - is that we lost an amazing young man who impacted our nation for a greater good, and now we are seeing the abundant fruit of his legacy as we are seeing people across the ideological spectrum begin to question the current direction of things. May the tide have a positive turn, both for our nation as well as the potential of thousands of Charlie Kirks to pick up his banner and wave it high. Thanks for letting me share again, and will see you next time.